比约恩·隆伯格（Bjorn Lomborg） 哥本哈根大学政治学博士，斯坦福大学胡佛研究所访问学者，国际著名环保活动家、评论家、专栏作家，哥本哈根共识中心主席。2004年被《时代》（Time）杂志评为“全球100位最具影响力人物”；2008年被英国《卫报》（Guardian）列入“可以拯救地球的50人”；2012年获选《外交政策》（Foreign Policy）“全球100位思想家”。 著有多部畅销书，包括：《要事第一》（Best Things First: The 12 most efficient solutions for the world’s poorest and our global SDG promises）、《错误警报：气候变化只是虚惊一场》（False Alarm: How Climate Change Panic Costs U...(展开全部)

Hurricanes batter our coasts. Wildfires rage across the American West. Glaciers collapse in the Artic. Politicians, activists, and the media espouse a common message: climate change is destroying the planet, and we must take drastic action immediately to stop it. Children panic about their future, and adults wonder if it is even ethical to bring new life into the world. Enough,...(展开全部)

Hurricanes batter our coasts. Wildfires rage across the American West. Glaciers collapse in the Artic. Politicians, activists, and the media espouse a common message: climate change is destroying the planet, and we must take drastic action immediately to stop it. Children panic about their future, and adults wonder if it is even ethical to bring new life into the world. Enough,...(展开全部)

比约恩·隆伯格（Bjorn Lomborg） 哥本哈根大学政治学博士，斯坦福大学胡佛研究所访问学者，国际著名环保活动家、评论家、专栏作家，哥本哈根共识中心主席。2004年被《时代》（Time）杂志评为“全球100位最具影响力人物”；2008年被英国《卫报》（Guardian）列入“可以拯救地球的50人”；2012年获选《外交政策》（Foreign Policy）“全球100位思想家”。 著有多部畅销书，包括：《要事第一》（Best Things First: The 12 most efficient solutions for the world’s poorest and our global SDG promises）、《错误警报：气候变化只是虚惊一场》（False Alarm: How Climate Change Panic Costs U...(展开全部)

當永續的不是資源與環境， 而是環保這門－－ 好‧生‧意 ▶暖化真的存在。但我們現在的對策正確嗎？ ▶你努力地減碳，但是真的「愛地球」嗎？ ▶國家利益，應該為了「環保」無限制讓步嗎？ 政客、環保販子與綠能業者，如何炮製世界末日？ ◎那些倡導環保的人，都搭飛機去參加活動？ 暖化確實存在。但出了什麼問題？隆堡認為，這不是科學家的錯──科學家們誠實地做了研究，也誠實地提出研究的成果。但不誠實的是政客、環保販子與綠能業者的解讀方向。 好比說，談暖化，談氣候變遷會摧毀農業、談人類會死於糧食不足，卻避談人類會適應，會改善技術與選擇；談二氧化碳會造成溫度上升，卻不談二氧化碳也會增進綠化（事實上地球的綠化程度是被改善的）；談人類可以做多少減碳的事，彷彿真的我們做點什麼，地球就會得救。 但我們真正要注意的是什麼呢？是個人的努力根本無濟於事，甚至可能有害。努力一年減碳之後...(展开全部)

當永續的不是資源與環境， 而是環保這門－－ 好‧生‧意 ▶暖化真的存在。但我們現在的對策正確嗎？ ▶你努力地減碳，但是真的「愛地球」嗎？ ▶國家利益，應該為了「環保」無限制讓步嗎？ 政客、環保販子與綠能業者，如何炮製世界末日？ ◎那些倡導環保的人，都搭飛機去參加活動？ 暖化確實存在。但出了什麼問題？隆堡認為，這不是科學家的錯──科學家們誠實地做了研究，也誠實地提出研究的成果。但不誠實的是政客、環保販子與綠能業者的解讀方向。 好比說，談暖化，談氣候變遷會摧毀農業、談人類會死於糧食不足，卻避談人類會適應，會改善技術與選擇；談二氧化碳會造成溫度上升，卻不談二氧化碳也會增進綠化（事實上地球的綠化程度是被改善的）；談人類可以做多少減碳的事，彷彿真的我們做點什麼，地球就會得救。 但我們真正要注意的是什麼呢？是個人的努力根本無濟於事，甚至可能有害。努力一年減碳之後...(展开全部)

Are we deranged? The acclaimed Indian novelist Amitav Ghosh argues that future generations may well think so. How else to explain our imaginative failure in the face of global warming? In his first major book of nonfiction since In an Antique Land, Ghosh examines our inability—at the level of literature, history, and politics—to grasp the scale and violence of climate change. T...(展开全部)

Are we deranged? The acclaimed Indian novelist Amitav Ghosh argues that future generations may well think so. How else to explain our imaginative failure in the face of global warming? In his first major book of nonfiction since In an Antique Land, Ghosh examines our inability—at the level of literature, history, and politics—to grasp the scale and violence of climate change. T...(展开全部)

Are we deranged? The acclaimed Indian novelist Amitav Ghosh argues that future generations may well think so. How else to explain our imaginative failure in the face of global warming? In his first major book of nonfiction since In an Antique Land, Ghosh examines our inability—at the level of literature, history, and politics—to grasp the scale and violence of climate change. T...(展开全部)

Climate change differs from any other problem that, as collective humanity, we face today. If it goes unchecked, the consequences are likely to be catastrophic for human life on earth. Yet for most people, and for many policy-makers too, it tends to be a 'back of the mind' issue. We recognise its importance and even its urgency, but for the most part it is swamped by more immed...(展开全部)